Skip to main content

What does a good trainer have in common with a good teacher?

 If you've been around here a bit, you'll probably know that I started out as a science teacher (and if you are new around here, welcome!), and I often get bemused reactions when I explain that I have been both a school teacher and a personal trainer (sometimes in the same day...).

Once in an interview for a part time teaching post, I was asked how I conflated the two sides of my working life.

I told them that I help people bring the best out of themselves. 

On reflection, I've realised that the best qualities of a teacher, and also a trainer, are the qualities of a good coach. 

The same head teacher who asked me that question, assured me that he was confident I could teach Maths instead of Science for a year, because I am a good teacher, and I have good maths skills, and the hardest part of teaching, is not the subject, but engaging the students for learning. The core skillset is universal, let me show you.

Old school schooling

Let's have a look at what we might see from non-coaching oriented trainers or teachers.

They might do stuff like this:

  • Gatekeep knowledge or information, keeping themselves in the position of "expert".
  • Make the decisions the student/client, and give authoritarian instructions.
  • Punishes for a misstep (lines or burpees).
  • Never admit that they might make a mistake, or not be all-knowing.
  • Expect each student/client to follow their example.
  • Assume that if a student/client can't achieve what they expected of them, that it is due to a fault with them or their attitude.
  • Fail to acknowledge diversity in experience, background or innate ability.
  • Assume that their lesson/training session is the most/only pressing issue for their student/client.
  • Label those who are not achieving as "lazy" or "difficult".
  • Expect one programme or scheme or work to be sufficient for all "worthy" individuals.
  • Judges everyone by the same standard.
It's well understood in both teaching and the fitness industry that this model doesn't work. It's OK for the upper-middle demographic who are motivated, able and have the right surroundings and influences to thrive - but those people were always going to do well. 

It doesn't serve those who are not blessed with "beneficial" genetics, a stress-free home life, parents who help with their homework, the time to prep perfect meals, neurotypical needs, good health, (assign any of these to either or both of the student/client groups as you please). It leads to trainers who "fire" clients who struggle to stay on plan, and kids who resent learning because they never got the chance to truly see what learning is.

The coaching mindset


So what happens if we update our approach, adding in what we know about human psychology, how we learn, how we form our habits etc. What does a good coach/teacher look like?

  • Puts the client/student in the position of expert, questions and adapts the process to work with them.
  • Focusses less on the information, and more on how to access and apply it, teaching them "how" rather than "what".
  • Has unconditional positive regard, respects each student/client as a potential-filled individual without judgement.
  • Turns "mistakes" into learning opportunities.
  • Has self awareness and is prepared to admit their own limitations or mistakes.
  • Understands that not all students/clients are willing/able to follow the coach's own path, and is excited to walk with them on their individual journey.
  • Recognise that for their learning/coaching to "stick" it has to be a pleasant experience that integrates into the student/client's interests and responsibilities.
  • Is curious about the barriers the student/client faces and supports the student/client in overcoming them.
  • Assumes that an individual is doing their best for their given circumstances, and works to adjust the circumstances, or the process, rather than blaming the student/client.
  • Sees each student/client as an individual and prepares multiple processes to accommodate them.
  • Has positive, but realistically achievable expectations.
  • Celebrates individual achievements as relative to each student/client's personal capabilities and goals.

    The results and reward of this approach speaks for itself. As a teacher, I've worked with some very "challenging" students, and found them to be my favourite class within a couple of months. As a trainer I work with a demographic which many trainers avoid (people with chronic pain and mobility dysfuction) and I love the magical mystery tour of discovering what they are capable of, while puzzling our way through some really "awkward" limitations.

    If I had one piece of advice for new trainers, looking to improve their skills, I'd say - don't get seduced by the highly technical stuff at first. Learn how to coach. Learn techniques like motivational interviewing. Learn to work alongside your clients as a guide, not perform at them as a guru. You can have all the information in the world, but it's useless until you can actually implement it to help real people.




    Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    Managing Fibromyalgia flares

    I've written before about living with EDS and Fibromyalgia ,  much of my personal fitness and health practices are geared around managing those conditions and keeping me as well as I can be. When managing a chronic health condition, particularly one that involves fatigue and potential flare ups, pacing, good nutrition, good sleep and generally taking care of yourself is always the first priority. Ideally we want to have as few flares as possible. But sometimes they still happen, and when they do, it's good to have a strategy in place. And I'm going to be talking in fairly general terms, because while EDS and Fibro are my personal experience, there is so little understanding of the mechanisms behind these conditions, that most strategies are going to be applicable to a number of conditions where crashes of exhaustion and pain are a feature. So what is a flare? A flare is a period where someone with chronic illness suffers increased symptoms for a short while. The

    What's the deal with yoga and hypermobility?

    I wanted to address a question today that keeps coming up on various hypermobility and EDS forums that I frequent. It comes up so often in fact that I feel like I have to write this all up in one place, to save me 1000s of key strokes of individual responses and distil some of my opinions and thought processes on the matter. It always goes like this. Someone asks a question like "I've just been diagnosed with hypermobility, I've been told I can't do yoga anymore..." The responses are always a mixture of "yes, my doctor/physio told me yoga was the worst thing I could do for my hypermobility" and "I do yoga and it's been the best thing for my hypermobility". So what gives? Well, I'm firmly in the "yoga is useful" camp, and I have to disclose that. I'm a yoga practitioner of around 20 years and a perinatal yoga teacher , as well as a personal trainer and bendy person. While I have the deepest respect for the medic

    Step away from the scale. Why weigh ins and weight loss don't match.

    I have a persistant bugbear when it comes to health coaching, and it's this issue of "weight". People are often talking about "losing weight", the number on the scale becomes a focus. "If only I could just get under 65kg" they say. Or worse I see advertised "buy this supplement and you can lose 20kg in a fortnight". I've found myself frequently sitting with a weight-focussed client and asking "if you were 2 dress sizes smaller, fit and toned, but you weighed the same as you do now, could you be happy with that?" You might be surprised how challenging a question that can be. For many people, particularly those who have struggled with weight loss, that number is the absolute key. They can wake up, feeling energised and full of life, slip into those jeans that used to live hopefully in the bottom of the drawer, check themselves in the mirror and love what they see... then they step on the scales, see the number is half a kilo

    Running with wolves

    When I started trying to reverse my post-baby weight gain , I spent several months, probably a year or so really floundering. I was exercising, hard. I didn't feel like I was overeating, but I wasn't losing weight. In fact sometimes I was gaining more and I couldn't figure out why. Often I get personal training clients coming to me with the same problem. They eat wholesome foods with few treats, they exercise hard several times a week, but there's no weight loss. The answer to this problem is a staple for a PT or nutrition coach. It's about activity levels. If I sit on the sofa all day, I burn through just under 2000 calories. If I do a 30 minute HIIT workout, I burn about 200 more. But if I spend my day doing housework, walking to town to do errands and generally being on my feet, I burn 3000 calories or more. It's not the workouts, it's the activity or NEAT (non exercise activity thermogenesis if you feel fancy). So how do you keep up your NEAT or

    Is being polite sabotaging your weight loss?

    I've been thinking a lot lately about the barriers that make it hard for people to stick to healthy habits, or even take them up in the first place. My personal training clients are a lovely bunch, and one thing I can certainly say is that none of them have come to me completely uninformed about healthy eating. Most people have done some homework before they get to the point of hiring me, and while I always go over the basics (never assume anything) I know that when I tell them stuff like this, it's not new information to them: Eat less to lose weight Eat protein with every meal Eat 5 portions of fruit and veg a day Consume high sugar and fat treats rarely and in moderate portions Drink water with every meal or snack Exercise regularly That's not rocket science, so why are so many people still struggling with it? Is it because "the rules" are more complicated? Are they missing the "weird trick" (spoiler alert, there are no weird tricks